İNGİLİZCE ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ ÖĞRETMENLİK UYGULAMASINDA EDEBİYAT KULLANIMI İLE İLGİLİ TUTUMLARI

Author :  

Year-Number: 2014-4
Language : null
Konu : İngiliz Dili Eğitimi
Number of pages: 170-185
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’deki bir İngiliz Dili Eğitimi programındaki öğretmen adaylarının stajda edebiyatın kullanılması konusundaki tutumlarını araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır.13 maddelik bir anketle İngiliz Dili Eğitimi programına kayıtlı 137 son sınıf öğrencisinin görüşleri alınmıştır. Dört ana başlık altında sınıflandırılmış ve bu şekilde analiz edilmiş olan anket, açık ve kapalı uçlu sorulardan oluşmuştur. Çalışma sonuçları, öğretmen adaylarının sınıflarına edebi metinleri dahil etme konusunda olumlu bir tutuma sahip olduklarını ifade etmektedir, fakat aynı öğretmen adayları edebi metinleri verimli bir şekilde işlemek için gereken yetkinliğe sahip olup olmadıkları ve/veya staj okulundaki öğrencilerin İngilizce dil becerilerinin yeterliği hususunda şüphe duyduklarından edebi metinleri kullanamayacaklarını itiraf etmişlerdir. Buna ek olarak, staj okullarından veya üniversitedeki staj programından kaynaklı bazı kısıtlamaların olduğu gerçeğinin de altını çizmişlerdir. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma öğretmen yetiştiren kurumlar için edebiyatın İngiliz Dili Eğitiminde kullanımı ile ilgili bazı önemli çıkarımlar içermektedir.

Keywords

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the attitudes of teacher candidates at an English Language Teaching (ELT) program in Turkey about the use of literature during practicum. Through a 13-item questionnaire, we gathered the beliefs and attitudes of 137 senior student teachers enrolled at this ELT program. Categorized and thus analysed under four main sections, the questionnaire consisted of a mix of open-ended and close-ended questions. The findings suggest pre-service teachers’ positive attitude towards using literature by including the literary texts into their classes; however, they admit that they cannot because they are in doubt about either self-efficacy on teaching and/or their students’ linguistic capability in the target language for processing literary texts. In addition, they highlight the fact that there are some limitations imposed upon by the practicum schools or by the framework of the practicum program of the university. In conclusion, the study has some important implications for teacher training institutions in terms of the use of literature in ELT.

Keywords


  • Acker, S. (1990). Teachers’ culture in an English primary school: Continuity and change. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11 , 257-273.

  • Almarza, G. G. (1996). Student foreign language teacher’s knowledge growth. In D Freeman and J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher Learning in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Arıkan, A. (2005). An Evaluation of Literature Curriculum in HU English Language Teaching Department. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 29, 27-33. Ankara: Bizim Buro Publications

  • Arslan, H. (2001). The use of referential and representational texts in literature classes in ELT departments. Unpublished master thesis. The University of Cukurova: Adana, Turkey.

  • Bassnett, S., & Grundy, P. (1993). Language through literature: creative language teaching through literature. London: Longman.

  • Cabaroğlu, N. (1999). Development of student teachers’ beliefs about learning and teaching in the context of a one-year post-graduate certificate of education programme in modern foreign languages. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Reading: Reading, England.

  • Carter, R., & Long, M. N. (1991). Teaching literature. New York: Longman.

  • Clark, L., Zuk, J., & Baramee, J. (2000). A literary approach to teaching cultural competence. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 11(3), 199-203.

  • Cochran-Smith, M. (2001). The outcomes question in teacher education. Teaching & Teacher Education, 17(5), 527–546.

  • Çıraklı, M. Z., & Kılıçkaya, F. (2011). Literature Courses in EFL Curriculum: Pre-Service Language Teachers’ Perceptions. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 1(3), 11-15.

  • D’Andrade, R. G. (1981). The cultural part of cognition. Cognitive Science, 5 , 179-195 .

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300–314.

  • Diamond, C. T. P. (1991). Teacher education as transformation. Philedelphia: Open University Press.

  • Farrell, T. S. C. (1999). Reflective practice in an EFL teacher development group. System, 27(2), 157-172.

  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (1983). Learning to teach. In L. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp.150-170). New York: Longman.

  • Fullan, M. (2006). The future of educational change: System thinkers in action. Journal of Educational Change, 7(1), 113-124.

  • Ghosn, I. K. (2002).Four good reasons to use literature in primary school ELT. ELT Journal, 56(2), 172-179.

  • Hişmanoğlu, M. (2005). Teaching English through literature. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(1).

  • Jay, G. S., Latosi-Sawin, E., Knight, L., & Crain, J. C. (1993). Four Comments on" Two Views on the Use of Literature in Composition". College English, 673-679.

  • Johnson, K. E. (1996). The vision versus the reality: The tensions of the TESOL practicum. In D. Freeman & J. Richards (Eds.), Teacher Learning in Language Teaching (pp. 30-49). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implication of research on teacher belief. Educational psychologist, 27(1), 65-90.

  • Khatib, M., Rezaei, S., & Derakhshan, A. (2011). Literature in EFL/ESL classroom. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 201.

  • Kirkgoz, Y. (2007). English language teaching in Turkey: Policy changes and their implementations. RELC Journal, 38(2), 216-28.

  • Kolb D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning Experience as a Source of Learning and Development. NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.

  • Korthagen, F. (2001). Linking Practice and Theory: The Pedagogy of Realistic Teacher Education. NJ, USA: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.

  • Kucukahmet, L. (2003). Ogretimi Planlama ve degerlendirme Planning and assessing teaching. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.

  • Littlewood, W.T. (1986). Literature in the school foreign-language course.In C. J. Brumfit and R. A. Carter (eds.) Literature and language teaching, (pp. 177-184). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • McKay, S. L. (2001). Literature as content for ESL/EFL. In Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language, (pp.415-428). USA: Heinle & Heinle Thomson Learning

  • McRae, J. (1991). Literature with a Small" l". London: Macmillan.

  • Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

  • Moody, H. L. B. (1968). Literary Appreciation. United Kingdom: Longman.

  • Moody, H. L. B. (1983). Approaches to the study of literature: a practitioner’s view. In C. J. Brumfit (ed.) Teaching Literature Overseas: Language Based Approaches, English Language Teaching Documents (pp. 17-37). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

  • Orton, R. E. (1996). How can teacher beliefs about student learning be justified?. Curriculum Inquiry, 133-146.

  • Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.

  • Roberts, J. (1998). Language teacher education. Great Britain: Arnold.

  • Rosenberg, M. J. & C. I. Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Components of Attitudes. In M. J. Rosenberg & C. I. Hovland (Eds.), Attitude Organization and Change: An Analysis of Consistency Among Attitude Components (pp. 1-14). New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Russell, T. (1988). From pre-service teacher education to first year of teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Teachers’ Professional Learning (pp. 13-34). Lewes: Falmer Press.

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4- 31.

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.

  • Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127-146). New York: Macmillan.

  • UNESCO Report. (2008). Turkey. In State of Teacher education in Asia-Pacific region (pp. 128-34). International Reading Association. Retrieved February 28, 2009 from http://www.reading.org/Libraries/Association_documents/Status_of_Teacher_Ed ucation_in_the_Asia-Pacific_Region_Final.sflb.ashx

  • Wallace, M. (1991). Training Foreign Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge Widdowson, H. G. (1975). Stylistics and the Teaching of Literature. London: Longman

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics