‘DEMOKRASİ TOPLUMU’NDA ÇOK-SESLİ DİL: İNSAN OLMANIN ÖTESİNDE BİR HARMONİ

Author :  

Year-Number: 2018-24
Language : null
Konu : Siyaset Bilimi ve U/A İlişkiler
Number of pages: 31-56
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

Siyasi düşünce ile toplumsal tarihte, demokratik bir toplumu tanımlamak hayli güç olagelmiştir. Bu husus, temelde demokrasi nedir ve çeşitli toplumlarda nasıl başarılabilir gibi sorulardan kaynaklanmaktadır. Bu, çok uzun soluklu bir sorudur; zira demokrasinin hikayesi de sosyo-politik tarihte uzun bir yola sahiptir. Demokrasi nedir konusu gerek bireysel, gerekse toplumsal düzeyde birinden ötekine değişen bir olgudur. Demokrasi farklı toplumlarda nasıl başarılabilir konusu ise karşılaştırmalı siyasetin bir sorunsalıdır. Tanımsal olarak demokrasi, seçilmiş temsilciler yoluyla yönetimdir. Bununla birlikte, bu tanımda demokrasi-toplum ilişkisi, serbest ve adil seçimler kanalıyla temsil edilmekten daha önemlidir; keza demokrasi esasta, eşit haklar, ifade özgürlüğü ve adil yargılama sağlayan ve azınlıkların görüşlerine de hoşgörü gösteren bir toplumsal yapıyı oluşturabilmelidir. Sağlıklı bir sivil toplum, hükümet sistemine değer veren ve paylaşımcı vizyona sahip bir sivil yaşam için çalışan sorumlu ve aktif yurttaşlar ister Bu nedenle, sağlıklı bir demokrasi toplumu, çok sesli olma anlamında bir dil harmonisi bünyesinde barındırır. İyi yurttaşlık, sorumlu davranış, tutum ve demokratik değerleri model alır ve bunlara değer verir. Böylece, kapsayıcılık, katılım ve özgürlük gibi değerler, cok-sesli bir toplumun ortak demokratik yaşam biçiminin vazgeçilemez kısımlarıdır. Bunlar, herkesin adalete hakkı olduğu, çokkültürlü ve çevresel olarak sürdürülebilir bir topluma güçlü taahhütünü gösterir. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışma, insan olmanın bir toplumda yaşamakla yeterlilik kazanamayacağını ortaya koymaya çalışırken, bunun sebebinin çok sesliliğin harmonisine sahip demokratik toplumların, birinin kendisini insan hissetmesinin de ötesinde bir şey olduğunu göstermeye çalışacaktır.

Keywords

Abstract

In the history of political thought and society, it became very difficult to define a democratic society. This difficulty mainly stems from the questions such as what democracy is and how it is accomplished in various societies. This is a long path of a question; because story of democracy is a long way down in the socio-political history. The issue of what the democracy is varies from one to another in both individual and societal level. The issue of how it is achieved in various societies is a problematic of the comparative politics. A democracy by definition is government through elected representatives. However, in this definition, democracy-society relationship is more significant than being represented through free and fair elections; because democracy should mainly enable a form of society, which favors equal rights, freedom of speech and a fair trial and tolerates the views of minorities. A healthy civil society requires responsible and active citizens who value the system of government and work towards a shared vision of civil life. That is why a healthy society of democracy comprises the harmony of language in terms of being multi-voiced. Good citizenship values and models responsible behavior, attitudes and democratic values. Thus, values such as inclusion, participation and freedom are indispensable parts of a multi-voiced society’s common democratic way of life. They reflect robust commitment to a multicultural and environmentally sustainable society where all are entitled to justice. Therewithal, this study will explore that being a human is not enough for being in a society since societies of democracy with harmony of multi-voiced languages is far beyond feeling oneself as a human being.

Keywords


  • Adams. K. (2002). “At the Table with Arendt: Towards a Self-Interested Practice of Coalition Discourse.” Hypatia, 17(1): 1-33.

  • Annan, K. (2016, December 6). Democracy under pressure. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/06/opinion/democracyunderpressure.htm l?_r=0 >, accessed at 11 May 2018.

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Asher, W., Brewer G. D., Shabbir Cheema, G. and Heffron, J. M. (2016). The Evolution of Development Thinking: Governance, Economics, Assistance, and Security. London: Palgrave.

  • Badescu, G. (2003). “Social Trust and Democratization in the Post-Communist Societies.” In: G. Badescu and E. M. Uslaner (eds.), Social Capital and the Transition to Democracy, London and New York: Routledge, 120-140.

  • Beetham, D., Carvalho, E., Landman, T. and Weir, T. (2008). Assessing the Quality of Democracy: A Practical Guide. Stockholm: International IDEA Pubs. Retrieved from http://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/assessing-quality-democracypracti cal-guide>, accessed 1 May 2018.

  • Bekaj, A. (2017). “Introduction.” In: Int. IDEA, The Global State of Democracy, Stockholm: IDEA Pubs.

  • Biko, N. (2012). “Quest for a True Humanity-Achieving the Vision.” Frank Talk, Issue 2, www.sbffranktalk.com, p 1.

  • Bowen, J. D. (2015). “Rethinking Democratic Governance: State Building, Autonomy, and Accountability in Correa’s Ecuador.” Journal of Politics in Latin America, 7(1): 83110.

  • Brehm, J., and W. Rahn. (1997). “Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequencies of Social Capital.” American Journal of Political Science, 41: 9991023.

  • Brown, M. (2003). “Democratic governance: toward a framework for sustainable peace.” Global Governance, 9: 141-146.

  • Brown, N. (2011). The Dynamics of Democratization: Dictatorship, Development, and Diffusion, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Butler, J., Laclau, E. & Žižek, E. (2000). Contingency, Hegemony, Universality. London, New York: Verso.

  • Butler, J. (2000). “Ethical Ambivalence.” In: Marjorie M. Garber, Beatrice Hannsen and Rebecca L. Walkowitz (eds), The Turn to Ethics, New York: Routledge, 15-28.

  • Centeno, M. (2002). Blood and Debt: War and the Nation-State in Latin America. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

  • Chenoweth, E. (2013). “Terrorism and Democracy.” Annual Review of Political Science, 16: 355-378.

  • Coatsworth, J. (1998). “Economic and Institutional Trajectories in Nineteenth-Century Latin America.” In: John Coatsworth and Alan Taylor (eds.), Latin America and the World Economy Since 1800, New York: Cambridge University Press, 23-54.

  • Cornwall, A. (2004). “New Democratic Spaces? The Politics and Dynamics of Institutionalised Participation.” IDS Bulletin, 35(2): 1-10.

  • Cornwall, A., and Goetz, A. M. (2005). “Democratizing Democracy: Feminist Perspectives.” Democratization, 12(5)(December): 783-800.

  • Conway, M. (1991). Political Participation in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.

  • Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Denyer, S. (2016, March 14). China paper says rise of ‘racist’ Trump shows democracy is scary. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost. com/news/ worldviews/wp/2016/03/14/china-paper-says-rise-of-racist-trumpshowsdemoc racy-is-scary/?utm_term=.43d2f11a 5738, accessed at February

  • Dewey, J. (1987). “Democracy Is Radical.” In: Jo Ann Boydston (ed.), Essays, Reviews, Trotsky Inquiry, Miscellany, and Liberalism and Social Action (John Dewey: The Later Works: 1925–1953, Volume 11: 1935–1937), Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 296-299.

  • Dryzek, J. (1996). “Political Inclusion and the Dynamics of Democratization.” The American Political Science Review, 90(3): 475-487.

  • Eaton, K. (2011). “Conservative Autonomy Movements: Territorial Dimensions of Ideological Conflict in Bolivia and Ecuador.” Comparative Politics, 43(3): 291-301.

  • Eaton, K. (2012). “The State of the State in Latin America: Challenges, Challengers, Responses and Deficits.” Revista de Ciencia Política, 32(3): 643-657.

  • Fink, B. (1995). The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Freedom House. (1999). Democracy’s Century: A Survey of Global Political Change in the 20th Century. Washington, DC: Freedom House.

  • Fukuyama, F., and Colby, S. (2011). “Half a Miracle.” Foreign Policy, May/June, 4-8.

  • Fung, A. (2003). “Associations and Democracy: Between Theories, Hopes, and Realities.” Annual Review of Sociology, 29: 515-539.

  • Gaventa, J. (2006). Triumph, Deficit or Contestation? Deepening the ‘Deepening Democracy’ Debate, Working Paper 264, Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex.

  • Gerring, J., Bond, PJ., Barndt, W.T., and Moreno, C. (2005). “Democracy and Economic Growth: A Historical Perspective”. World Politics, 57(3): 323-364.

  • Giraudy, A. (2012). “Conceptualizing State Strength: Moving Beyond Strong and Weak States.” Revista de Ciencia Política, 32(3): 599-611.

  • Gleditsch, N.-P. and Hegre, H. (1997). “Peace and democracy: three levels of analysis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41(2): 283-310.

  • Graeber, D. (2013). The Democracy Project: A History, A Crisis, A Movement. London: Allen Lane.

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.

  • Green, P., and Cornell, D. (2005). “Rethinking Democratic Theory: The American Case.” Journal of Social Philosophy, 36(5)(Winter): 517-535.

  • Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy. 3rd edn, Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Human Rights Council (2012, December 17). Study on common challenges facing States in their efforts to secure democracy and the rule of law from a human rights perspective. Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, A/HRC/22/29. Retrieved from http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Sessi on22/A.HRC.22.29_English.pdf>, accessed at 22 May 2018.

  • Huntington, S. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Imbrasaitė, J. (2010). “What Types of Participants?: Patterns of Political Participation in Lithuania.” Kultūra iR Visuomenė; socialinių tyrimų žurnalas, 1(1): 43-61.

  • Independent Commission on Multilateralism (2016). “Pulling Together: The Multilateral System and its Future.” Final report of the Independent Commission on Multilateralism, https://www.icm2016.org/ IMG/pdf/icm_summary_report.pdf>, accessed 9 May 2018.

  • Inglehart, R. (1979). “Political Action: The Impact of Values, Cognitive Level, and Social Background.” In: S. H. Barnes, M. Kaase, K. L. Allerbeck, B. G. Farah, F. Heunks, R. Inglehart, M. K. Jennings, H. D. Klingemann, A. Marsh and L. Rosenmayr (eds.), Political Action. Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies, London: Sage Publications, 343-381.

  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Int. IDEA (2016). Voter Turnout Database. Retrieved from http://www.idea.int/datatools/data/voter-turnout>, accessed at 4 May 2018.

  • Int. IDEA (2017). The Global State of Democracy: Exploring Democracy’s Resilience. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance Publications.

  • Jandl, M. (2017). Towards the Monitoring of Goal 16 of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, Helsinki: European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control. Retrieved from http://www.heuni.fi/material/attachments/heuni/reports/vcqOZtedb/HEUNI_re port_ no.86.pdf>, accessed at 9 May 2018.

  • Kaase, M., and A. Marsh. (1979). “Political Action. A Theoretical Perspective.” In: S. H. Barnes, M. Kaase, K. L. Allerbeck, B. G. Farah, F. Heunks, R. Inglehart, M. K. Jennings, H. D. Klingemann, A. Marsh and L.Rosenmayr (eds.), Political Action. Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies, London: Sage Publications, 27

  • Kohli, A. (2004). State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kurtz, M., and Schrank, A. (2012). “Capturing State Strength: Experimental and Econometric Approaches.” Revista de Ciencia Política, 32(3): 613-621.

  • Lake, R. D., and R. Huckfeldt. (1998). “Social Capital, Social Networks, and Political Participation.” Political Psychology, 19: 567-584.

  • Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

  • Lemert, C. (2010). Social Theory: The Multicultural and Classic Readings, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Westview Press.

  • Large, J. (2006). Democracy and Terrorism: The Impact of the Anti. In: J. Large and T. D. Sisk (eds.), Democracy, Conflict, and Human Security, Vol. 2: Further Reading, Stockholm: International IDEA Pubs. Retrieved from http://www.idea.int/publications/catalogue/democracy-conflict-and-humansecurity-volume2-further-reading, accessed at 1 May 2018.

  • Lopez-Alves, F. (2000). State Formation and Democracy in Latin America, 1810-1900. Durham: Duke University Press.

  • Lummis, C. D. (1996). Radical Democracy. New York: Cornell University Press.

  • Mahoney, J. (2010). Colonialism and Postcolonial Development: Spanish America in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Mann, M. (1986). The Sources of Social Power, Volume One: A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Marsh, A. and M. Kaase. (1979). “Measuring Political Action.” In: S. H. Barnes, M. Kaase, K. L. Allerbeck, B. G. Farah, F. Heunks, R. Inglehart, M. K. Jennings, H. D. Klingemann, A. Marsh and L. Rosenmayr (eds.), Political Action. Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies, London: Sage Publications, 77-96.

  • Mauceri, P. (2004). “States, Elites, and the Response to Insurgency: Some Preliminary Comparisons between Colombia and Peru.” In: Jo-Marie Burt and Philip Mauceri (eds.), Politics in the Andes: Identity, Conflict, Reform, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 146-163.

  • Meer, S. (1998). Women Speak: Reflections on Our Struggles 1982–1997. Oxfam GB: Kwela Books.

  • Milbrath, L., and M. L. Goel. (1977). Political Participation. Chicago, IL.: Rand McNally.

  • Møller, J. and Skaaning, S. (2013). “The Third Wave: Inside the Numbers.” Journal of Democracy, 2(4): 97-109.

  • Mouffe, C. (1993). The Return of the Political. New York: Verso.

  • Mouffe, C. (2000). The Democratic Paradox. New York: Verso.

  • Mouffe, C. (2002). Politics and Passions: The Stakes of Democracy. London: Centre for the Study of Democracy.

  • Munck, R. (2002). “Globalization and Democracy: A New “Great Transformation?”.” The Annals of the American Academic of Political and Social Science, 581: 10-21.

  • Norris, P. (2014). Why Electoral Integrity Matters, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • O’Donnell, G. (1994). “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy, 5(1): 55-69.

  • O’Donnell, G. (2004). “Human Development, Human Rights, and Democracy.” In: G. O’Donnell, J. Vargas Cullell, and O. M. Iazzetta (eds.), The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 9-92.

  • OECD-DAC. (2010). The State’s Legitimacy in Fragile Situations. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/ dataoecd/45/6/44794487.pdf>, accessed at 19 May

  • Ould-Mohammedou, M. and Sisk, T. (eds.). (2016). Democratisation in the 21st Century: Reviving Transitology, Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Pacek, A. C. (1994). “Macroeconomic Conditions and Electoral Politics in East Central Europe.” Americal Journal of Political Science, 38: 723-744.

  • Paczynska, A. (2005). “Inequality, Political Participation, and Democratic Deepening in Poland.” East European Politics and Societies, 19: 573-613.

  • Parry, G., G. Moyser and N. Day. (1992). Political Participation and Democracy in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Piper, N. and Rother, S. (2015). “Migration and democracy: citizenship and human rights from a multilevel perspective.” International Migration, 53(3): 3-7.

  • Pospieszna, P. (2015). “Democracy assistance and women’s political empowerment in post-conflict countries.” Democratization, 22(7): 1250-1272.

  • Przeworski, A., and Limongi, L. (1993). “Political Regimes and Economic Growth.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3): 51-69.

  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Rosenstone, St. J., and J. M. Hansen. (1993). Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: MacMillan.

  • Russett, B., and Oneal, J. R. (2001). Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.

  • Schneider, A. (2012). State-building and Tax Regimes in Central America. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sen, A. (1999a). “Democracy as a universal value.” Journal of Democracy, 10(3): 3-17.

  • Sen, A. (1999b). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Sisk, T. (2017). “Democracy’s Resilience in A Changing World.” In: Int. IDEA, The Global State of Democracy, Stockholm: IDEA Pubs, 36-67.

  • Smith, A.M. (1998). Laclau and Mouffe: The Radical Democratic Imaginary. New York: Routledge.

  • Soifer, H., and vom Hau. M. (2008). “Unpacking the Strength of the State: The Utility of State Infrastructural Power.” Studies in Comparative International Development, 43: 219-230.

  • Stoner, K. and McFaul, M. (eds.). (2013). Transitions to Democracy: A Comparative Perspective, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

  • Talisse, R. B. (2007). A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy. New York: Routledge.

  • Tefsai, Y. (1996). Liberation and Orthodoxy. The Promise and Failures of Inter-confessional Dialogue. New York: Maryknoll, Orbis.

  • Hassim, S. (2003). “Representation, Participation and Democratic Effectiveness: Feminist Challenges to Representative Democracy in South Africa.” In: Anne Marie Goetz and Shireen Hassim (eds.), No Shortcuts to Power: African Women in Politics and Policy-Making, London: Zed Books.

  • The Wall Street Journal, 9 March 2005.

  • Thomassen, J., and J. van Deth. (1998). “Political Involvement and Democratic Attitudes. Simon J. Popular Conceptions of Democracy in Postcommunist Europe.” In: S. H. Barnes and J. Simon (eds.), The Postcommunist Citizen, Budapest: Erasmus Foundation, IPS of the Hungarian Academy of Science, 139-164.

  • Tilly, C. (1985). “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime.” In: Peter Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol (eds.), Bringing the State Back In, New York: Cambridge University Press, 169-191.

  • Triandis, H. C. (1993). “Collectivism and Individualism as Cultural Syndromes.” Cross- Cultural Studies, 27(3/4): 155-180.

  • Tripp, A. M. (1999). New Trends in Women’s Political Participation in Africa. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.

  • Tsikata, D. (2001). National Machineries for the Advancement of Women in Africa: Are they Transforming Gender Relations?. Ghana: Third World Network-Africa.

  • United Nations (UN) (2015). The Millennium Development Goals Report. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/2015_MDG_Report/pdf/MDG%202015%20 rev%20(July%201).pdf>, accessed at 26 May 2018.

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2009). Human Development Report 2009: Overcoming Barriers: Human Mobility and Development. New York: UNDP.

  • UN Environment (UNEP). (2004). “Understanding Environment, Conflict, and Cooperation.” http://www. unep.org/pdf/ECC.pdf>, accessed 19 May 2018.

  • Uslaner, E. M., and M. Brown. (2005). “Inequality, Trust, and Civic Engagement.” American Politics Research, 33(6): 868-894.

  • Valionis, A. (2000). “Socialinių ir politinių vertybių kaita Lietuvoje 1990-1999 metais: adaptavimasis fragmentiškoje tikrovėje”. In: A. Matulionis (ed.), Kultūrologija, vol. 6, Vilnius: Gervelė, 324-349.

  • Valionis, A. (2001). “Socialinės ir politinės vertybės.” In: A. Matulionis, St. Juknevičius and A. Mitrikas (eds.), Europa ir mes, Vilnius: Gervelė, 83-115. Verba, S., and N. H. Nie. (1972). Participation in America. Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

  • Verba, S., K. L. Schlozman and H. E. Brady. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Verba, S., K. L. Schlozman and H. E. Brady. (2000). “Rational Action and Political Activity.” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12(3): 243-268.

  • Villoro, L. (1998). “Which Democracy?.” In: Cherif Bassiouni (Gen.Rapp.), Democracy: Its Principles and Achievement, Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union Press, 95-103.

  • Walsh, D. (2002). “The Liberal Moment: Women and Just Debate in South Africa 1994– 1996.” Paper presented at the 2002 Midwest Political Science Association Conference.

  • Wolin, S.S. (2008). Democracy Incorporated. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Youngs, R. (2015). The Puzzle of Non-Western Democracy. Brussels: Carnegie Europe.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics